Westpoll: 50-50 in Brand

The West Australian has published a Westpoll survey of 400 voters in the outer southern Perth seat of Brand, held by Kim Beazley from 1996 to 2007 and by Gary Gray thereafter. The two-party vote is said to be 50-50, but it’s hard to square this with primary vote figures of 43 per cent for Labor (3.2 per cent below their result in 2007) and 42 per cent (up 3.4 per cent) for the Liberals. On 2007 preferences it would have been approaching 52-48, pointing to a swing against Labor of 4 per cent. Oddly, we are also told that if the old boundaries were in place the Liberals would be leading 45 per cent to 41 per cent on the primary vote and 52-48 on two-party (I make it 50-50), even though the redistribution has only boosted Labor 0.4 per cent by Antony Green’s estimation. The poll had a typical Westpoll sample of 406, giving it a high margin-of-error of a bit below 5 per cent.

Other findings:

• Fifty-six per cent of respondents oppposed the resources super profits tax, with only 25 per cent supporting it.

• Julia Gillard was found to be preferred over Kevin Rudd as preferred leader, 34 per cent to 31 per cent.

• Thirty-nine per cent said Tony Abbott’s “gospel truth” remark made them think less of him, against 54 per cent who said it made no difference.

• The government received “poor” ratings of 82 per cent poor rating for handling of the insulation program, 81 per cent for asylum seekers as poor (against 14 per cent good) and 60 per cent for climate change policy (against 29 per cent0 good).

• By contrast, and in good news for Julia Gillard, 46 per cent rated the government’s handling of the school hall construction program as good against 43 per cent poor.

• Respondents were split down the middle on the federal government’s health reform package, rated good by 45 per cent and poor by 46 per cent.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

2,177 comments on “Westpoll: 50-50 in Brand”

Comments Page 11 of 17
1 10 11 12 17
  1. No i choose the vote.
    But I will NOT help out any Liberal campaign or handout HTV cards. They dont deserve my support.

    I’m surprised I renewed my membership. I put it off for almost 3 months.

    I dislike both major political leaders.

    I dont care who wins. Either way it will be crap for this country. Both sides are rubbish atm.

    I dont care how you slice it or how much many ppl think Rudd is better than Abbott. Both will do a bad job as PM and both dont deserve to be PM in my view.

  2. If Gough did quit the party it would be a positive mark for Labor.

    Dammit Truthy! Each day you keep winning the Dumb Post of the Day Award – give someone else a go!

  3. Aristotle@1829

    If Gough did quit the party it would be a positive mark for Labor.

    Tell me, The Truth Hurts: when you get your ears examined and your Doctor uses an otoscope to look into your ear canal, does your Doctor always express amazement at being able to see straight through to the other side, or only sometimes?

    Nah, the Doc’s vision would be blocked by the large lump of Olea laurifolia (South African black ironwood) between Troothy’s ears. This reputedly has the densest wood of any tree, though there is some dispute about this.

  4. [Half the Liberal party members in Caulfield vote for him.]

    That wouldnt surprise me one bit.

    Danby is at least a right-wing Laborite.

  5. The BP Gulf Oil Extavaganza is being touted as USA’s worst ever ecological disaster. Give me a break. Here are four that have been far worse:

    (1) Clearing of the great US forests.
    (2) Putting the long- and short- grass prairies to the plough.
    (3) The continental-scale hydrology stuff up
    (4) The USA contribution to AGW.

  6. OK, guys, predictions for Newpoll.

    99-1 for the ALP

    Seriously, probably not much movement. I will be more on the optimistic side and say 51-49 ALP, primaries more or less stay the same.

    However I will say this:

    if the Coalition improve at all, Truthy/GP will claim that the government is doomed and that us “Labor hacks” are in denial. If it is in any way good for Labor, it’ll be “a rogue/blip” and that us “Labor hacks” shouldn’t get comfortable because it’ll change

  7. Glen, just out of curiousity (as per your avatar), did you watch that Churchill movie on ABC1 last night? I must confess I found it rather disappointing…

  8. Glen

    [I dont care how you slice it or how much many ppl think Rudd is better than Abbott. Both will do a bad job as PM and both dont deserve to be PM in my view.]

    Abbott is Rudd’s biggest asset. And Rudd is Abbott’s greatest asset.

    According to Bolt, Rudd will be gone on a month. I’ll give him 10/1 on that happening. He really is hopeless.

    [My tip is that Rudd is now finished and will be replaced. I’m guessing this could even occur within four weeks. ]

  9. [Newspoll truck just whizzed past, package fell off. A surprising number in there.]

    What would be a surprising number? Either Labor 54 or Libs 54?

  10. ruawake@1857

    Newspoll truck just whizzed past, package fell off. A surprising number in there.

    What would be a surprising number? Either Labor 54 or Libs 54?

    Well with Matthew Franklin ruling out a 50-50 – I predict the former. and considering Mumble’s WA post the Lib’s won’t be happy 🙂

  11. Glen, I’m sure you’ll be converted by the great Danby’s latest newsletter, of which I had an advance preview, as a graduate of the great Danby’s office. It’s full of good news about all the great things the Rudd government has done for Melbourne Ports, as well as the great Danby’s latest foreign policy achievements, which you will doubtless approve of. After 11 years of empty promises from the Libs, the Jewish schools have got so much money they are about to declare Julia Gillard an honorary Elder of Zion.

  12. What would be a surprising number? Either Labor 54 or Libs 54?

    If so, can the Labor supporters on here promise to prepare themselves for the worst possible result, just in case? I don’t want any “what’s the point?” attitudes…

  13. TSOP

    I actually enjoyed it. But I can see that it didnt go well into the late 30s. It hung about abit in the mid 1930s. Still I liked it 😀

    Also the HBO film after this ‘Into the Storm’ with Brendan Gleeson as Winston was good too I thought.

    It would be good to have a credible, centrist/moderate, economically conservative political party just in case the majors put up two shocking people for PM.

  14. If the poll has the Liberals in front there would be no one to blame but the Governmetn for not putting the foot down.

    But as I have repeatable said whilst Abbott might be travelling well at this stage I seriously dealt he can maintain that.

  15. Psephos at 1811:

    [ If Labor loses Hasluck they will probably also lose Swan, which is technically a Labor seat on the new boundaries although it has a sitting Liberal member. (Who is such a non-entity that his name escapes me.) ]

    Steve Irons. Him and Luke Simpkins can be forgiven for being non-entities because they just got there at exactly the wrong time to be relevant… meanwhile, I’d love to know what Mal Washer does with himself, after a dozen years in parliament. Or Barry Haase. What do they do?

    Speaking of which, check this out. Anyone else see a slight problem with referring to Haase as the ‘MP for Durack’? 😉

  16. Danby broke ranks with his own Government on the Isaeli forged passports affair.

    That’s his latest foreign policy achievement?

  17. It hung about abit in the mid 1930s.

    Yeah, that’s what I disliked about it. I would’ve liked to see him during wartime, his years in opposition, his return to #10, his eventual retirement and final years. Mind you, I thought it was going to be a miniseries – I think it would’ve been better served if it were. Nevertheless, good performances all round!

  18. Alan Kohler’s finance report on ABC TV Sydney: mining stocks were down, with the government’s advertising campaign

    😐

  19. It would be good to have a credible, centrist/moderate, economically conservative political party just in case the majors put up two shocking people for PM.

    Like the Democrats?

  20. Tried to get some info out of Mumble:

    # Frank Calabrese frankscan65

    @zombiemao Don’t you start 🙂 He can have Truthy 🙂 less than 5 seconds ago via web in reply to zombiemao

    # Frank Calabrese frankscan65

    @mumbletwits not even a teensy one about who’s in front ?numbers can come later, we want a sign – ANY sign 🙂 half a minute ago via web in reply to mumbletwits

    # Zombie Mao zombiemao

    @mumbletwits fine by us ;D 1 minute ago via TweetDeck

    # Peter Brent mumbletwits

    @frankscan65 Would have to kill you, sorry. 2 minutes ago via web in reply to frankscan65

  21. As someone said earlier. Rudd should Challenge Abbott to a proper debate on the RSPT. Force him to debate facts and proper logic. And later in the day this time too.

  22. TSOP

    They could make a 6 part series just about.

    Still I recommend finding or hoping for ‘Into the Storm’ being played on the ABC because that was based around his war time exploits.

  23. I would like to have seen a thorough examination of the way in which Churchill, with 23 idle divisions sitting in England and the threat of a German invasion of Britain gone, allowed Singapore to fall, and was quite prepared to sacrifice Australia to boot, while
    Australians were fighting in North Africa.

    How debaclement. How betrayment.

  24. I will allow that Danby is one of the few people in the House for whom I have an unstinting admiration. He is principled, sticks to his principles, and I like his principles.

  25. I would like to have seen a thorough examination of the way in which Churchill, with 23 idle divisions sitting in England and the threat of a German invasion of Britain gone, allowed Singapore to fall, and was quite prepared to sacrifice Australia to boot, while
    Australians were fighting in North Africa.

    How debaclement. How betrayment.

    I believe this is one of the historical arguments in favour of Australia becoming a republic…

  26. [Like the Democrats?]

    The Democrats were left wing populists.

    I’m thinking more of ummm…Moderate Party (Sweden), The People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) from (Holland), Fine Gael (Ireland) or Red Tories in Canada.

  27. Whoops , pasted the wrong bit in 1883. It was meant to be about some lovely fella eating not having to eat hats!

  28. The Democrats were left wing populists.

    They did let the GST through, and the first wave of IR reforms. They lost the plot when Cheryl defected. And when Meg Lees quit after various feuds with NSD. I agree that by the end they were a pale imitation of the Greens.

  29. Boerwar 1878

    I just like historical dramatisations. I didn’t mean to turn it political. If I enjoyed a production about Atilla the Hun, it doesn’t mean I support him. (Not that I am comparing Churchill to Atilla)

    Glen, I will keep an eye out for “Into The Storm” (or torrent it.)

  30. [I believe this is one of the historical arguments in favour of Australia becoming a republic…]

    That the internet is full of wise-after-the-event armchair generals?

Comments are closed.

Comments Page 11 of 17
1 10 11 12 17